Here is how William Clay “Bill” Ford, Jr. just explained his own continuing oversight of the effort to promote maximum automobile use in the United States:
I feel like I’m working for my children and my grandchildren.The New York Times, December 18, 2020
These folks believe their own* propaganda.
*Hat-tip to green activists’ “EV” promotion.
Trump is a logical endpoint of Reaganism, which has never yet — not even now — been opposed, since it emerged.
In subtler times, the overclass merely used GM heads to front the Pentagon. Now, they need not feign even that much distance. Boeing execs now sit themselves right down in the public seat, to zero controversy.
The attached talk, never very subtle, is now utterly shameless.
According to The New York Times, here is what the new Defense Secretary said at a recent insider meeting:
“We are not the Department of No,” Mr. Shanahan told Pentagon officials after Space Force was announced.
Not the Department of No. Mark that one down.
The military being a department of yeses is extremely relevant to the ongoing reign of the automobile, since both that phenomenon and the Pentagon budget pass the social order stringent apublic-spending litmus test. The terms of that test come straight from corporate capitalism, which mandates that government spending be huge and growing, yet occur only in the very few product-usage areas that neither directly supplant capitalist sales nor establish precedents harmful to the reigning insistence that profit-maximizers’ schemes are the only possible way to meet human needs.
The notion that automobiles — and particularly “luxury” automobiles — are toys speaks volumes about our form of civilization and culture. The fact that this multiply appalling suggestion can be used to sell these infernal things is one of the many points of interest.
With allies like these, who needs enemies? Today’s addition to the DbC Hall of Mirrors hails from Australia. He is Ted Trainer, “environmentalist and author.” Apparently, he’s about as smart as he looks:
Many on the left would share your concern for sustainability but would question your focus on “consumerism” and “affluence”. Most working class people have little choice about housing, transport, car usages or buying product that have been produced in harmful ways. Your response?
Yes it’s true that most people are locked into consumer society due to faulty systems and structures that, for example, force people to drive to work. But I do insist that the demand for affluence is a key driver of today’s major global problems.
As such, the main target, the main problem group is not the corporations or the capitalist class. They have their power because people in general grant it to them. The problem group, the key to transition, is people in general.
The problem is people in general! Wow.